livanpinar wrote: Currently using TT maps. I have used NQ maps before and can't see the difference.
Too bad for you
livanpinar wrote:Which provider excels in the North America region?
Most advise the HERE maps (the Navteq ones) for the US. I can't say that is 100% true as I know of at least one (a close friend and ex moderator here) who says TT are best in California.
Let me say this: for every question you ask, the personal likings next to the location can demand for a certain make of maps. That is so in the USA and in Europe. Best is to test yourself. It may differ from State to State, as it differs between European countries.
livanpinar wrote:Does it make any difference if you calculate one route using TT and calculate it using NQ?
You should also test that yourself. See my previous answer.
livanpinar wrote: If you are using TT, but have NQ files in the same folder, will IGO use the files it needs from another provider? Since I have a bunch of .hnr files for North America, but I am using TT maps as default, does keeping these maps make any sense or it depends on which maps are selected? Or maybe TT has its own means for calculating fast, economical, short, etc.
It's best not to mix the files from different mapmakers. When in the mapfolder different folders are placed for the different makes, a mapchanger addon let's you change between HERE and TeleAtlas/TomTom.
livanpinar wrote:What is a GREEN route? I guess it has to do with the environment, but how?
Calculating the route with the less fuel consumption, based on how you set up the average fuel consumption in settings? Less consumption = less pollution = green.