Wed Oct 23, 2013 6:33 pm
ConnorMcLeod wrote:TTH says 5076 is the version for my device !!
Current official navcore for your XXL is 9.510, which is compatible with ALL maps!!
Wed Oct 23, 2013 11:00 pm
I have navcore 9.401 for radar thing
That map works fine
Thanks again
That map works fine
Thanks again
Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:26 am
ConnorMcLeod wrote:radar thing
radar thing???
Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:42 am
Radar alerts.
In france (dunno if it is automatic when you are located in france or if it is related to your TT account settings), TT doesn't show you radars as it is done everywhere else. When there is a radar, TT inform you about a 4km zone, though last radar files integrate exact coordinates of radars.
So, using the old navcore (before the law of early 2012) allows to have same alerts as in the past.
I would like to know if there is a way to activate those alerts using latest navcore though, there should be a way to cheat the AI.
In france (dunno if it is automatic when you are located in france or if it is related to your TT account settings), TT doesn't show you radars as it is done everywhere else. When there is a radar, TT inform you about a 4km zone, though last radar files integrate exact coordinates of radars.
So, using the old navcore (before the law of early 2012) allows to have same alerts as in the past.
I would like to know if there is a way to activate those alerts using latest navcore though, there should be a way to cheat the AI.
Thu Oct 24, 2013 5:47 pm
Tue Oct 29, 2013 5:36 am
The reporting of Danger Zones is still possible and legal but the location will be randomised for all users
From what i have checked it (randomization) is not the case.
However until your device has a GPS fix and knows it is in France, the menu may still refer to Speed Cameras.
This is interesting, but would require some hack i guess.
I think a new thread is worth for those new questions
Thanks for link.
Tue Oct 29, 2013 5:46 am
ConnorMcLeod wrote:1. From what i have checked it (randomization) is not the case.
2. This is interesting, but would require some hack i guess.
3. I think a new thread is worth for those new questions
4.Thanks for link.
1. What have you found to be the case?
2. What would require some hack you guess?
3. Since you are only the 2nd or 3rd member to make a comment in nearly 2 years, I don't think a new thread is necessary.
4. You are Welcome.